OBAMA WON!! YES!! Good job America. Electoral votes Obama:290 Romney:200 ( u need 270 to win )
There are still a few undecided states yet, but Obama wins
There are still a few undecided states yet, but Obama wins
+7
Le_Binster
Sandyman
thek826
PlayboxxIsEpic
PZH145
Farquor
showtime3636
11 posters
THE NEW PRESIDENT
showtime3636- Posts : 735
Join date : 2012-04-28
Location : United states of america
Farquor- Moderator+
- Posts : 1283
Join date : 2012-07-21
Age : 27
adda boy obama. i knew you wouldnt let that sleesball romney win 
PZH145- Moderator+
- Posts : 2721
Join date : 2011-10-16
Age : 24
Location : Antarctica; Training the Walrus population!
Yay Obama!
Haha take that in the face moneysacks!
Haha take that in the face moneysacks!
PlayboxxIsEpic- Posts : 1189
Join date : 2012-03-24
Age : 26
Location : Inn.. The.. Underworld... :)
When i watch erb of Obama vs mitt romney.. i thought the eagle would win the election of president. o well GOOD JOB OBAMA
thek826- Admin
- Posts : 3667
Join date : 2011-10-03
Age : 25
Location : New York
I honestly don't care who officially wins. Whether it had been Obama or Romney, the true loser is the one you see in the mirror as they are both the status quo. #fml
If we had this system of voting, maybe America wouldn't be as f*cked up as it is today:
If we had this system of voting, maybe America wouldn't be as f*cked up as it is today:
showtime3636- Posts : 735
Join date : 2012-04-28
Location : United states of america
thek826 wrote:I honestly don't care who officially wins. Whether it had been Obama or Romney, the true loser is the one you see in the mirror as they are both the status quo. #fml
If we had this system of voting, maybe America wouldn't be as f*cked up as it is today:
That's the stupidest Way of voting ive ever heard, the electoral college is fine.
PZH145- Moderator+
- Posts : 2721
Join date : 2011-10-16
Age : 24
Location : Antarctica; Training the Walrus population!
i think that one is more fair then the one we got today really
Sandyman- Admin
- Posts : 2477
Join date : 2011-10-18
Age : 27
Location : In the shadows, watching you.
Nice. And play, in that Lincoln won.
PZH145- Moderator+
- Posts : 2721
Join date : 2011-10-16
Age : 24
Location : Antarctica; Training the Walrus population!
No i won
Le_Binster- Posts : 2087
Join date : 2012-01-24
Age : 23
Location : Australia Mate!
PZH145 wrote:No i won
:O Will you give every american 1 free bag of potatoes?
thek826- Admin
- Posts : 3667
Join date : 2011-10-03
Age : 25
Location : New York
showtime3636 wrote:thek826 wrote:I honestly don't care who officially wins. Whether it had been Obama or Romney, the true loser is the one you see in the mirror as they are both the status quo. #fml
If we had this system of voting, maybe America wouldn't be as f*cked up as it is today:
That's the stupidest Way of voting ive ever heard, the electoral college is fine.
orly now? I never new that you thought someone winning with only 22% of the vote is "fine."
The real stupidest way of voting is the current way we are voting 
Wikwoo- Posts : 278
Join date : 2012-02-24
Age : 24
Location : Manitoba, Canada
Canada's way of voting is t3h b3st!!!11
showtime3636- Posts : 735
Join date : 2012-04-28
Location : United states of america
thek826 wrote:showtime3636 wrote:thek826 wrote:I honestly don't care who officially wins. Whether it had been Obama or Romney, the true loser is the one you see in the mirror as they are both the status quo. #fml
If we had this system of voting, maybe America wouldn't be as f*cked up as it is today:
That's the stupidest Way of voting ive ever heard, the electoral college is fine.
orly now? I never new that you thought someone winning with 100% of the vote is "fine."
I
Yes I do think that makes sense if u win 100%
Wikwoo- Posts : 278
Join date : 2012-02-24
Age : 24
Location : Manitoba, Canada
showtime3636 wrote:thek826 wrote:showtime3636 wrote:thek826 wrote:I honestly don't care who officially wins. Whether it had been Obama or Romney, the true loser is the one you see in the mirror as they are both the status quo. #fml
If we had this system of voting, maybe America wouldn't be as f*cked up as it is today:
That's the stupidest Way of voting ive ever heard, the electoral college is fine.
orly now? I never new that you thought someone winning with 22% of the vote is "fine."
I
Yes I do think that makes sense if u win 100%
^Fail troll
PZH145- Moderator+
- Posts : 2721
Join date : 2011-10-16
Age : 24
Location : Antarctica; Training the Walrus population!
yes and free Potato cakes alsosimon1 wrote:PZH145 wrote:No i won
:O Will you give every american 1 free bag of potatoes?
thek826- Admin
- Posts : 3667
Join date : 2011-10-03
Age : 25
Location : New York
showtime3636 wrote:thek826 wrote:showtime3636 wrote:thek826 wrote:I honestly don't care who officially wins. Whether it had been Obama or Romney, the true loser is the one you see in the mirror as they are both the status quo. #fml
If we had this system of voting, maybe America wouldn't be as f*cked up as it is today:
That's the stupidest Way of voting ive ever heard, the electoral college is fine.
orly now? I never new that you thought someone winning with 100% of the vote is "fine."
I
Yes I do think that makes sense if u win 100%
The obvious troll is obvious. I didn't ask if you thought winning with 100% of the vote makes sense. I asked you if winning with 22% of votes from Americans made sense. If you just admit that you're wrong or stop responding, I won't hold it against you
showtime3636- Posts : 735
Join date : 2012-04-28
Location : United states of america
That guy is wrong, the number of votes directly represents the population of the state. You get votes for your representatives plus your senators. Every states has at least 2 senators and 1 representative, so that's how the smallest is 3. Say your state has 15 representatives. You would have 17 votes. (15+2=17) that makes everything fair.
thek826- Admin
- Posts : 3667
Join date : 2011-10-03
Age : 25
Location : New York
showtime3636 wrote:That guy is wrong, the number of votes directly represents the population of the state. You get votes for your representatives plus your senators. Every states has at least 2 senators and 1 representative, so that's how the smallest is 3. Say your state has 15 representatives. You would have 17 votes. (15+2=17) that makes everything fair.
"at least 2 senators" no, all states have only 2 senators. A state like California has the same amount of senators as tiny Nebraska. This is why it's not directly based on how much people your state has. If your claim was correct, then how did George Bush win even though he got less actual votes than Al Gore? The answer is your claim is not correct.
showtime3636- Posts : 735
Join date : 2012-04-28
Location : United states of america
thek826 wrote:showtime3636 wrote:That guy is wrong, the number of votes directly represents the population of the state. You get votes for your representatives plus your senators. Every states has at least 2 senators and 1 representative, so that's how the smallest is 3. Say your state has 15 representatives. You would have 17 votes. (15+2=17) that makes everything fair.
"at least 2 senators" no, all states have only 2 senators. A state like California has the same amount of senators as tiny Nebraska. This is why it's not directly based on how much people your state has. If your claim was correct, then how did George Bush win even though he got less actual votes than Al Gore? The answer is your claim is not correct.
The at least part was meant for the two combined. And bush won because he had more elecoral votes obviously. Having the popular vote wouldn't work good, because all those backcountry hicks and potheads don't know what's best for the country. We need the opinions of the hard working middle class.
thek826- Admin
- Posts : 3667
Join date : 2011-10-03
Age : 25
Location : New York
showtime3636 wrote:thek826 wrote:showtime3636 wrote:That guy is wrong, the number of votes directly represents the population of the state. You get votes for your representatives plus your senators. Every states has at least 2 senators and 1 representative, so that's how the smallest is 3. Say your state has 15 representatives. You would have 17 votes. (15+2=17) that makes everything fair.
"at least 2 senators" no, all states have only 2 senators. A state like California has the same amount of senators as tiny Nebraska. This is why it's not directly based on how much people your state has. If your claim was correct, then how did George Bush win even though he got less actual votes than Al Gore? The answer is your claim is not correct.
The at least part was meant for the two combined. And bush won because he had more elecoral votes obviously. Having the popular vote wouldn't work good, because all those backcountry hicks and potheads don't know what's best for the country. We need the opinions of the hard working middle class.
This is fine until you consider the majority of Americans are the middle class. What you're saying is that the middle class is too dumb to pick a president properly. Funnily enough, the middle class chose Al Gore over Bush, but Bush won thanks to your philosophy. Are you prepared to argue that Bush was an amazing president? If so, please submit your resume to Bill O' Reilly, because they need more hardcore conservatives who shut out the opinions of others.
PZH145- Moderator+
- Posts : 2721
Join date : 2011-10-16
Age : 24
Location : Antarctica; Training the Walrus population!
Jesus you guys are fighting over polishits
quit it
quit it
Sandyman- Admin
- Posts : 2477
Join date : 2011-10-18
Age : 27
Location : In the shadows, watching you.
Psssh I hate politics. You nubs should stop arguing about this shit.
44bottles- Co-Owner
- Posts : 2023
Join date : 2011-10-17
Age : 27
Location : Australia
thek826 wrote:showtime3636 wrote:thek826 wrote:showtime3636 wrote:That guy is wrong, the number of votes directly represents the population of the state. You get votes for your representatives plus your senators. Every states has at least 2 senators and 1 representative, so that's how the smallest is 3. Say your state has 15 representatives. You would have 17 votes. (15+2=17) that makes everything fair.
"at least 2 senators" no, all states have only 2 senators. A state like California has the same amount of senators as tiny Nebraska. This is why it's not directly based on how much people your state has. If your claim was correct, then how did George Bush win even though he got less actual votes than Al Gore? The answer is your claim is not correct.
The at least part was meant for the two combined. And bush won because he had more elecoral votes obviously. Having the popular vote wouldn't work good, because all those backcountry hicks and potheads don't know what's best for the country. We need the opinions of the hard working middle class.
This is fine until you consider the majority of Americans are the middle class. What you're saying is that the middle class is too dumb to pick a president properly. Funnily enough, the middle class chose Al Gore over Bush, but Bush won thanks to your philosophy. Are you prepared to argue that Bush was an amazing president? If so, please submit your resume to Bill O' Reilly, because they need more hardcore conservatives who shut out the opinions of others.
Le_Binster- Posts : 2087
Join date : 2012-01-24
Age : 23
Location : Australia Mate!
Sandyman wrote:Psssh I hate politics. You nubs should stop arguing about this shit.
^^ Dat.
pokemonb02- Moderator+
- Posts : 937
Join date : 2011-11-09
Age : 24
Location : In the 4th Great Ninja War
Ok... are voting system is shit. End of story
|
|
|