My friend goat57? was jailed because he broke down an abandoned house. To me this is a stupid rule because if a house is abandoned and it hasn't been used in awhile then what's wrong with destroying it? Also it's funny to me that he is new to the server, did not commit a serious offence, and this rule is not clear in any way. I just found out about the rule today by Ryan. So i hope that you consider either un-jailing him or removing this rule because to me it seems pointless. (P.S.) Ryan had said that he wouldn't be un-jailed for a long time. Why is this? It was a very minor thing to do.
+6
PZH145
NightShifting
thek826
Le_Binster
UnknownMage
Alexgogo12345
10 posters
Weird rule
Alexgogo12345- Moderator+
- Posts : 409
Join date : 2012-01-06
Age : 27
Location : Brighton, England
UnknownMage- Owner
- Posts : 2097
Join date : 2011-10-03
Age : 28
This rule is based off of people saying they destroyed the house thinking it was "abandoned".
That (among many other things) is an excuse I do not find acceptable.
Therefore, if you destroy a house that is not yours, it is still griefing.
You will need to ask a staff member before taking down a house you think is abandoned.
Otherwise, you will risk getting banned.
The rule isn't that you can't destroy houses that you think are abandoned. The rule IS that you have to ASK FOR PERMISSION from staff.
Doesn't matter if it is abandoned or not, it will be considered griefing as long as it isn't yours.
Your friend can post a ban appeal, unless he has already used up his second chance.
That (among many other things) is an excuse I do not find acceptable.
Therefore, if you destroy a house that is not yours, it is still griefing.
You will need to ask a staff member before taking down a house you think is abandoned.
Otherwise, you will risk getting banned.
The rule isn't that you can't destroy houses that you think are abandoned. The rule IS that you have to ASK FOR PERMISSION from staff.
Doesn't matter if it is abandoned or not, it will be considered griefing as long as it isn't yours.
Your friend can post a ban appeal, unless he has already used up his second chance.
Le_Binster- Posts : 2087
Join date : 2012-01-24
Age : 23
Location : Australia Mate!
Technically this is griefing -_-
thek826- Admin
- Posts : 3667
Join date : 2011-10-03
Age : 25
Location : New York
Alexgogo12345 wrote:My friend goat57? was jailed because he broke down an abandoned house. To me this is a stupid rule because if a house is abandoned and it hasn't been used in awhile then what's wrong with destroying it? Also it's funny to me that he is new to the server, did not commit a serious offence, and this rule is not clear in any way. I just found out about the rule today by Ryan. So i hope that you consider either un-jailing him or removing this rule because to me it seems pointless. (P.S.) Ryan had said that he wouldn't be un-jailed for a long time. Why is this? It was a very minor thing to do.
The rule is that you can't destroy an abandoned (or any player-made structure for that matter) without prior permission from a staff member. He must make a ban appeal before he is unjailed. Also, I thought I asked Unknown to use the console to ban goat57? (because we can't ban people with "?"). I guess he forgot about it lol.
UnknownMage- Owner
- Posts : 2097
Join date : 2011-10-03
Age : 28
Sorry about that thek :3
Anyways, since the question mark can't be banned normally, I will ban their IP for now.
Anyways, since the question mark can't be banned normally, I will ban their IP for now.
NightShifting- Posts : 19
Join date : 2012-05-15
Age : 27
Location : Las Vegas, NV
Couldn't have been abandoned if your friend got banned. Someone had to tell a mod about it! xD
PZH145- Moderator+
- Posts : 2721
Join date : 2011-10-16
Age : 24
Location : Antarctica; Training the Walrus population!
have you not read the previous posts? ._.NightShifting wrote:Couldn't have been abandoned if your friend got banned. Someone had to tell a mod about it! xD
We good here?
DatMrRyan- Admin
- Posts : 1248
Join date : 2012-01-31
Location : Playing with Garry's mod.
I think these things are a little obvious, Or something I like to call COMMON SENSE. I said he wont be "un-jailed" for a long time because I believe he's already been banned before and hasnt made some sort of appeal.
Alexgogo12345- Moderator+
- Posts : 409
Join date : 2012-01-06
Age : 27
Location : Brighton, England
Because he's stupid and doesn't know how. 44bottles had to make him member without an application because he couldn't figure it out.XD i think he is literally retarded??
44bottles- Co-Owner
- Posts : 2023
Join date : 2011-10-17
Age : 27
Location : Australia
Did i make him member?
PZH145- Moderator+
- Posts : 2721
Join date : 2011-10-16
Age : 24
Location : Antarctica; Training the Walrus population!
i knew you'd be here :3
Alexgogo12345- Moderator+
- Posts : 409
Join date : 2012-01-06
Age : 27
Location : Brighton, England
yes you did 44bottles. You made his original account member but he forgot his password on that account so he made a new one
Alexgogo12345- Moderator+
- Posts : 409
Join date : 2012-01-06
Age : 27
Location : Brighton, England
oh yeah and also nightshifting thek was the one who saw my friend break down the house
thek826- Admin
- Posts : 3667
Join date : 2011-10-03
Age : 25
Location : New York
NightShifting wrote:Couldn't have been abandoned if your friend got banned. Someone had to tell a mod about it! xD
Please stop trying to be a moderator. It is currently abandoned since Chris, the owner of the house, has already been banned. However, the rules explicitly state that no one (besides staff members) can destroy abandoned houses. In addition, Chris could make a ban appeal and come back to find his house missing, so it isn't necessarily completely abandoned.
Anyway, if he doesn't make a ban appeal he won't be unbanned (or unjailed if mage still hasn't banned him)
Alexgogo12345- Moderator+
- Posts : 409
Join date : 2012-01-06
Age : 27
Location : Brighton, England
well then my friend is screwed because he doesn't know how to do that
humanoidmeatball- Posts : 92
Join date : 2012-02-05
Age : 24
Location : IN YO CLOSET!!!
jail? is that like, when u log in, u are just in a bedrock box or something?Alexgogo12345 wrote:My friend goat57? was jailed because he broke down an abandoned house. To me this is a stupid rule because if a house is abandoned and it hasn't been used in awhile then what's wrong with destroying it? Also it's funny to me that he is new to the server, did not commit a serious offence, and this rule is not clear in any way. I just found out about the rule today by Ryan. So i hope that you consider either un-jailing him or removing this rule because to me it seems pointless. (P.S.) Ryan had said that he wouldn't be un-jailed for a long time. Why is this? It was a very minor thing to do.
iivastdogs- Posts : 418
Join date : 2012-02-19
no like a jail place that ur stukk in /back or /home etc commands won't work eccept talking
Alexgogo12345- Moderator+
- Posts : 409
Join date : 2012-01-06
Age : 27
Location : Brighton, England
he is muted too and put into an actual jail
thek826- Admin
- Posts : 3667
Join date : 2011-10-03
Age : 25
Location : New York
Alexgogo12345 wrote:he is muted too and put into an actual jail
Yes, to simulate being banned, since I can't ban him.
NightShifting- Posts : 19
Join date : 2012-05-15
Age : 27
Location : Las Vegas, NV
Was not moderating, was just stating in a public forum. (Off-topic)
So please, bitch to yourself, and don't quote me, PM and save yourself of posting anything direct toward me in this topic, I am done. lol xD
So please, bitch to yourself, and don't quote me, PM and save yourself of posting anything direct toward me in this topic, I am done. lol xD
UnknownMage- Owner
- Posts : 2097
Join date : 2011-10-03
Age : 28
NightShifting wrote:Was not moderating, was just stating in a public forum. (Off-topic)
So please, bitch to yourself, and don't quote me, PM and save yourself of posting anything direct toward me in this topic, I am done. lol xD
Umm, he is just stating his opinion.
My opinion is that "bitch to yourself" was kind of uncalled for.
I understand you can consider "you moderating" can count as "your opinion", but you can let the staff do their jobs for now. After all, that is why they became staff, to take on extra responsibilities to let regular members just enjoy their time even more.
|
|
|